Letters to the Editor: Trump is wrong about social media, but should Twitter be the arbiter of truth? – Los Angeles Times
To the editor: President Trump’s attempt to stifle criticism and blame others for his misdeeds and lies threatens the internet platforms used by millions of Americans.
His executive order seeks to eliminate the 1996 congressional protections for Twitter, Facebook and other platforms enacted to promote free expression. He claims the law allows internet platforms to restrict only comments and tweets that are “obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing or otherwise objectionable.”
I guess he assumes that his tweets don’t fall into any of those categories.
Contrary to Twitter commenting on Trump’s tweets, Facebook Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg contends (rightly) that “Facebook shouldn’t be the arbiter of truth of everything that people say online.” I would like to think that most Americans can determine for themselves when someone is lying. We don’t need some self-appointed corporate arbiter to determine that for us.
Let people make their comments. Newspapers have plenty of opportunities to shine the light of truth on those comments if necessary.
Ken Goldman, Beverly Hills
..
To the editor: I don’t get Trump’s reasoning on social media’s legal shield.
If he tries to remove their shield, it would only force them to pull any posting of anything that could be libelous, which they would have the right to do.
Trump could lose millions of followers on Twitter with the stroke of his pen.
Richard H. Smith, Cerritos
..
To the editor: We are in the middle of a pandemic. Millions of people face permanent job loss. We are facing a type of poverty unknown to masses of Americans. Racism has returned to us disguised as a recreational sport.
Yet, Trump plays on Twitter like the emperor Nero is said to have fiddled on the violin during the Great Fire of Rome.
Failure is not pretty, but you have to look at it to find a solution. Trump is not up to the job.
Marcella Hill, Los Angeles
Get thought-provoking perspectives with our weekly newsletter.
By continuing, you agree to our Terms of Service, which include arbitration and a class action waiver. You agree that we and our third-party vendors may collect and use your information, including through cookies, pixels and similar technologies, for the purposes set forth in our Privacy Policy such as personalizing your experience and ads.
Author and CBS News correspondent Jonathan Vigliotti attempts to answer some questions about rebuilding communities in his new book about the Palisades Fire — and names a motive for a quick rebuild: the Olympic games coming to Los Angeles in 2028.
Today we discuss one of the pivotal events of the 1960s: the assassination of Robert F. Kennedy. Though the gunman was caught at the scene, confessed at trial, and even bragged about the shooting, his motives have largely been forgotten.
Modern LA earned its first smoggy nickname 450 years ago, as the “bay of smokes.” At the La Brea tar pits, we take a short walk through a long history with curator Regan Dunn, who explains how and why the first Angelenos would have set fires that filled the broad bowl of LA and foretold the curse of smog.
Subscribe for unlimited access
Site Map
Follow Us
MORE FROM THE L.A. TIMES
