SEC, Elon Musk defend ‘compromise’ settlement over Twitter purchases – Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

Upcoming Event
Legal Considerations in Leveraging Home Equity for Cash Flow & Legacy Goals

Reuters via Reuters Connect//June 2, 2026//
SEC, Elon Musk defend ‘compromise’ settlement over Twitter purchases
Tesla CEO Elon Musk looks at President Donald Trump as he speaks to the media, at the White House in Washington, D.C., on March 11, 2025. (REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque)

Reuters via Reuters Connect//June 2, 2026//

Elon Musk and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission defended their settlement over his purchase of Twitter shares, saying it reflected compromises and was not tainted by collusion, after the judge overseeing the case said the accord raised “red flags.”
Musk called the settlement a fair, adequate and reasonable resolution where “each side gave something up and each side gained something,” according to a Monday night filing in the Washington, D.C., federal court.
In a separate filing on Monday, the SEC added that the accord would let Musk publicly deny its accusations, reflecting a recent policy change governing defendants who settle enforcement actions.

The settlement requires a trust in Musk’s name to pay a $1.5 million civil penalty to resolve SEC claims the world’s richest person took 11 days too long in March and April 2022 to disclose his purchase of Twitter shares, letting him buy at low prices before investors caught on.
Musk maintained that the delay was inadvertent. He ultimately paid $44 billion for Twitter in October 2022 and renamed it X. Musk’s businesses also include Tesla and SpaceX.
At a May 13 hearing, U.S. District Court Judge Sparkle Sooknanan said she could not “rubber stamp” the settlement, questioning why the SEC fined the trust instead of Musk and was content to recoup just 1 percent of his $150 million of alleged ill-gotten gains.

She also said she must consider whether the settlement served the public interest and was not tainted by collusion or corruption.
SEC says the settlement benefits the public
Musk and the SEC said the settlement did not reflect “improper collusion,” and resulted from arm’s-length negotiations.
According to the SEC, the $1.5 million penalty is the largest of its type, topping the previous $950,000 high, and settling with the trust mirrored the regulator’s practice in recent cases.
“The public benefits from an injunction that has the practical effect of binding Musk whenever he acts through the Revocable Trust, an investment vehicle that he appears to use to manage much of his wealth,” the SEC said.
Musk, meanwhile, said he could have won at trial, including over whether a politically motivated SEC singled him out for enforcement and targeted his free speech.
He contrasted the penalty with the $500,000 penalty imposed in 2024 against billionaire investor Carl Icahn for “far more serious” conduct, waiting more than three years to reveal he pledged a majority of stock in his Icahn Enterprises to obtain billions of dollars in personal margin loans. Icahn Enterprises paid a separate $1.5 million penalty.
“Accepting a certain, immediate, record civil penalty in exchange for releasing a legally doubtful claim is [a] paradigmatic bilateral compromise,” Musk said.
Musk is a former adviser to Republican President Donald Trump. The SEC sued Musk six days before Democratic President Joe Biden left the White House.
SEC Chair Paul Atkins has refocused the regulator’s priorities, as the Trump administration curtails corporate enforcement activity.
Former SEC enforcement chief Margaret Ryan left abruptly in March after just six months on the job, following clashes with SEC leaders over enforcement.
 Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Stephen Coates and Chizu Nomiyama

Share this!
Former President Joe Biden sued the Justice Department to prevent release of private interview recordings amid[…]
May 29, 2026
Capitol Police Officers Harry Dunn and Daniel Hodges sued to block the DOJ’s $1.8 billion fund compensating pe[…]
May 21, 2026
The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear pharmaceutical companies’ challenge to Biden-era Medicare drug price n[…]
May 20, 2026
Donald Trump voluntarily dismissed his $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS over leaked tax returns, according […]
May 19, 2026
The South Carolina Supreme Court reversed the denial of Alex Murdaugh’s motion for a new trial in his double m[…]
May 14, 2026
The Cultural Landscape Foundation filed a lawsuit to halt the Trump administration’s renovation of the Lincoln[…]
May 12, 2026
Sign up for your daily digest of Massachusetts News.


Will legal challenges succeed in blocking the Trump administration’s nearly $1.8 billion fund to compensate people who claim they were targets of a “weaponized” legal system after the Jan. 6, 2021, riot?

View Results
The Appeals Court ruled that an unsigned legal malpractice settlement was enforceable after parties […]
Personal injury attorneys caution that a parent’s purchase of an e-bike or other “micromobility […]
Despite noncompliance with Chapter 61A’s notice requirements, a group of abutting property owners […]
A Peabody lawyer has won the right to pursue his claim for a share of fees from a $29,614 arbitratio[…]
A Superior Court judge denied a Morgan & Morgan attorney pro hac vice admission after AI-generated f[…]
A Superior Court judge has ruled an employer waived arbitration rights by filing counterclaims and e[…]
Federal lawsuits challenge lengthy CRAB delays in Massachusetts retirement appeals, alleging due pro[…]
Recent amendments to Mass. R. Prof. C. 1.15 have significantly changed how Massachusetts lawyers mus[…]
Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly provides 24/7 legal news coverage and events honoring top legal professionals.
Get our free MLW e-alerts & breaking news notifications!
Subscribe for access to the latest digital and special editions.
© 2026 BridgeTower Media. All rights reserved.
Use of this website is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Your California Privacy Rights/Privacy Policy | Do Not Sell My Info/Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies, web beacons, pixels, tags, software development kits, and related tracking technologies, as described in our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy, for purposes that may include website operation, analytics, analyzing site usage, enhancing site navigation optimizing a user’s experience, and third-party advertising or marketing purposes. Through these technologies, we and certain third parties may automatically collect information about your interactions with our website, such as your browsing behavior and page views. We also may share this information about your activity on our website with our social media, advertising, analytics, and other business partners. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of these technologies and that we can share information about your activity on our website with third parties in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. If you do not agree with our use of non-essential tracking technologies, please click “Reject All.” You may opt out of certain non-essential technologies by clicking “Cookie Settings.”
 

source